Supreme Court next term. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear two cases together in order to resolve a split in the U. In Zarda v.
Jump to navigation. The U. Much legal analysis and other commentary thus may be expected in the coming months.
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court announced that it would review three cases that could decide whether the ban on discrimination based on sex in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of applies to discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. While the outcome is uncertain, the court should take an expansive view of the protections embodied in Title VII and hold that the act prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Failure to do so would set back the struggle for equal rights and further erode public trust in the ability of the court to safeguard the rights of all Americans.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has said the act does guarantee the protections. But the Trump administration has taken the opposite position, saying that the landmark legislation that outlawed discrimination based on race, religion, national origin and, notably, sex, cannot fairly be read to apply to discrimination based on sexual orientation or transgender status. The three cases the court accepted are the first concerning L. Kennedya champion of gay rights.
Bill Chappell. The U. Supreme Court will take up three cases that hinge on federal discrimination laws and whether they protect LGBTQ workers when its new term begins in October.
By Stephanie Francis Ward. On Monday, the U. Supreme Court accepted three petitions regarding whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation and transgender status.
Please contact customerservices lexology. Expanding on her previous post on the subject, on May 1,Law published the following expert analysis authored by Squire Patton Boggs labor and employment attorney Melissa Legault. After 11 private conferences during which the U.
Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world. The Supreme Court now has the chance to settle whether federal law safeguards LGBT people from workplace discrimination, which has split courts around the country and left a patchwork of legal protections in the wake of those divisions. In a groundbreaking decision inthe U. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit became the first federal appeals court to rule that Title VII covers sexual orientation when it said a lesbian job applicant could sue an Indiana community college for discrimination.
On Wednesday a three-judge panel of the Eighth Circuit heard oral argument in Horton v. Its effects may be felt across the country as well: a finding that sexual orientation is not protected would deepen an emerging circuit split, perhaps making it more likely that the Supreme Court will step in to resolve the question. The Court could do so as early as this morning.